<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Ubuntu Need a New Flavor Aimed At Developers?</title>
	<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/</link>
	<description>Hacking On A Personal Level</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Poleman</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-152</link>
		<author>Poleman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Taking into account that there's a big percentage of ubuntu users that code usually that would be a great flavour. I would use it if it were available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking into account that there&#8217;s a big percentage of ubuntu users that code usually that would be a great flavour. I would use it if it were available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Davis</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-87</link>
		<author>Zac Davis</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-87</guid>
		<description>@Logan, I'm sorry to hear that your efforts didn't work out.  But, if you can offer any advice about it.  I would appreciate it immensely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Logan, I&#8217;m sorry to hear that your efforts didn&#8217;t work out.  But, if you can offer any advice about it.  I would appreciate it immensely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logan</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-82</link>
		<author>Logan</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 04:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I did start a programmer's distro based off ubuntu a little while ago. I was using fluxbox. It turned out alright but not of the release quality. Im interested in following this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did start a programmer&#8217;s distro based off ubuntu a little while ago. I was using fluxbox. It turned out alright but not of the release quality. Im interested in following this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Davis</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-77</link>
		<author>Zac Davis</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I'll probably include options for all stable desktop options. Gnome does seem like the logical one to set as default, which is probably be how it will end up.  But I definitely won't have Compiz and anything like that installed right off the bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll probably include options for all stable desktop options. Gnome does seem like the logical one to set as default, which is probably be how it will end up.  But I definitely won&#8217;t have Compiz and anything like that installed right off the bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paintballbob</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-76</link>
		<author>paintballbob</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>this is an amazing idea.
i think the default desktop should be gnome for Devbuntu because thats the normal default. Since you are worried about cutting all the fluff i would also recommend including an option for XFCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is an amazing idea.<br />
i think the default desktop should be gnome for Devbuntu because thats the normal default. Since you are worried about cutting all the fluff i would also recommend including an option for XFCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Davis</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-75</link>
		<author>Zac Davis</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the expressed interest, you two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the expressed interest, you two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Nealon</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-74</link>
		<author>James Nealon</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>A simple, and yet exquisitely wonderful idea at the same time.  

I can understand Mint, Mythbuntu, etc.., but I cannot understand why this proposed distro has not been around since day one.

Thank you for raising my attention about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple, and yet exquisitely wonderful idea at the same time.  </p>
<p>I can understand Mint, Mythbuntu, etc.., but I cannot understand why this proposed distro has not been around since day one.</p>
<p>Thank you for raising my attention about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dani</title>
		<link>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-73</link>
		<author>Dani</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 08:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://nighthacker.net/does-ubuntu-need-a-new-flavor-aimed-at-developers/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>That's great! I really would use it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great! I really would use it <img src='http://nighthacker.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
